This blog post is an excerpt from Bench Press in the January/February 2012 issue of LawNow magazine. To view the magazine and subscribe please go to www.lawnow.org.
Four daughters who received nothing from their late father’s estate asked the British Columbia Supreme Court to vary his will.
William Werbenuk left his substantial estate to his only son, making no provision for his daughters.
The Judge stated that what was at issue was whether based on contemporary moral standards, adequate provision for proper maintenance and support was objectively considered by the father towards his daughters.
Justice Wong accepted evidence by the daughters that their father ruled the family home, and his wife and daughters by terror.
The son, on the other hand was “favoured and indulged.”
Justice Wong noted: “It is a testament to the strength of character and resilience of the plaintiffs that they rose above their upbringing and manifestly cared for their father.” He ruled that modern contemporary standards reject the father’s declared intention to disinherit his daughters, and that they had a valid moral claim to share in the family wealth.
He wrote: “The provisions of William Werbenuk’s will were not those of a judicious testator acting in accordance with society’s reasonable expectations of what a judicious parent would do in the circumstances by reference to contemporary community standards. The Judge divided the estate between the five siblings.
Werbenuk v. Werbenuk Estate, 2010 BCSC 1678